[ExI] Kiss Device (was Re: buttload)

spike spike66 at att.net
Mon May 9 23:58:32 UTC 2011



-----Original Message-----
From: extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org
[mailto:extropy-chat-bounces at lists.extropy.org] On Behalf Of Kelly Anderson
>

>...I understand that there is a kind of tupperware party for female sex
toys that has caught on in some parts of the country. Probably not in
Utah...

>> Anyone who has the money for all this elaborate teledildonics could
easily just hire 
>>a  bio-unit to take care of one's needs...

>...Yes, it is expensive. Yet there exists a group of men who are so
uncomfortable dealing with real women, that there is a market for such
devices. Following a typical expense curve the prices should come down, and
the devices will also work better. If enough people buy them.  -Kelly


Ja.  Kelly, I singled out you the other day when I was asking about the
religious objection to sexbots.  The reason is along the lines of what you
just cited.  There are guys who aren't really suitable mates, yet they are
religious, they own buttloads of money, and for whatever reason would not
consider hiring a person to take care of their urges.  There aren't a lot of
these, but I have known a few.  I personally wouldn't hire a harlot even if
I needed relief.  I would sooner just find one and give her 100 bucks with
no request for services in return, than hire one.  Hiring a harlot doesn't
feel a damn bit right to me, even if I were single, and I am not even
religious.

For that small subset of humanity, the sexbot would be just the E-ticket
ride they have wanted all their lives.  I can imagine a religious objection
to that, the Judas argument: if anyone has money for that kind of silliness,
then they should be giving it to their church.  Of course, Jesus gave Judas
a smackdown for that notion (Matthew 26: 6-11.)  I can imagine the learned
theologians would shy away from the Onan argument.

So, if we recognize it's a limited market, it looks to me like it would work
out OK for the religious.

That being said, I thought the whole episode in Matthew 26 sounded weird.
This other woman was in there fooling with Jesus' feet while he was in the
process of copulating with Simon's friend Bethany.  Hey I didn't make it up.
It says right there in Matthew 26 verse 6: "Now when Jesus was in Bethany,
at the home of Simon the leper..."

But I digress.

spike








More information about the extropy-chat mailing list