[ExI] REVOLUTION NOW! all-thing.org

[Ben Zaiboc]

Giulio wrote:
"There is a de-facto power monopoly of big corporations/banks and
corrupted big governments, _acting together_. The government that
zealot libertarians hate is owned by the same banks and corporations
that they worship."


How is this result any different to what 'unfettered capitalism' would lead to? (except that the situation wouldn't need to be covered up or denied)

Do the people here who are in favour of free-market capitalism think it's right and proper that powerful corporations (or individuals) should be able to buy or pressure governments into making legislation that suppresses their competitors, restricts consumer's choices, and forms legalised monopolies?

If you don't think so, you're in agreement with Zero State, despite the confusion that use of the term 'anti-capitalist' has caused.

Ben Zaiboc