[ExI] Destructive uploading.

The Avantguardian avantguardian2020 at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 12 14:54:59 UTC 2011



----- Original Message -----
> From: Stefano Vaj <stefano.vaj at gmail.com>
> To: The Avantguardian <avantguardian2020 at yahoo.com>; ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 4:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [ExI] Destructive uploading.
> 
> On 10 September 2011 16:42, The Avantguardian
> <avantguardian2020 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Unless you have proof that the mind is a classical physical system then it 
> is an assumption that the mind can be represented by classical information...
> 
> I have no "proof" that a diesel engine is a "classical physical
> system", whatever this may be, but if it works it is not an assumption
> that its reproduction is good enough.

Touche, Ami.

> BTW, should we ever improbably discover that biological brains make
> any especial use of quantum effects, and this is an unwarranted
> assumption given that they are even poorer at typical quantum
> computation tasks than a PC, this would simply mean that quantum
> processors are not only feasible, but trivial, and that in order to
> emulate biological brains with acceptable performances it is best to
> include a quantum coprocessor in your architecture. What's the big
> deal?

It would be more expensive with a quantum coprocessor and take longer until first deployment if it is even on our Everett branch. :-(

What with all the doom and gloomers running the markets, we might be lucky to be able maintain our infrastructure in the decades ahead.

>> You are not just information; you are information in context, in 
> runtime, constantly interacting with everything around you.
> 
> The context is still only information. Let us assume, eg, that
> emulating a brain would not be enough to give place to a convincingly
> anthropomorphical ethology. Now, since much of our complexity resides
> in our nervous system, to emulate an entire body along with its
> sensorial channels would not add really much to our chore...

I am sorry but simulated or not, I would not "feel" the same without my balls or my adrenal glands.
 
>> I am suggesting that if the mind is simply classical information, it would 
> have likely been adequately explained by now by the likes of Euler, Boltzman, 
> Turing, or Shannon.
> 
> I think that Wolfram shows well enough that while the Principle of
> Computational Equivalence shows us that all systems are basically
> equivalent, the idea that "classical information" is easy to deal with
> exclusively depends on a selection bias. Most of reality, biological
> or not, is in fact quite intractable...

Unless you meant to say "tractable", I tend to agree.

>> No it would only still be Niagra Falls if people didn't start calling 
> it "Reagan Falls" or something equally arbitrary. Same would probably 
> go for your upload. If someone hacked into your upload and did a search and 
> replace on your memories and substituted Fred for every occurance of John, would 
> you still be John Clark or would you then be Fred Clark?
> 
> A Rose by Another Name. What an upload is and whether an upload is an
> upload is represents ultimately a sociological, not a scientific or
> philosophical issue.

You are probably right but as an attorney, would you allow an upload to amend the Last Will and Testament of the deceased natural person?





More information about the extropy-chat mailing list