msd001 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 28 02:59:55 UTC 2012
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:46 PM, David Lubkin <lubkin at unreasonable.com> wrote:
> Think out of the box. Assume you have, say, $20 billion to spend on the
> problem and you don't care whose laws you break, collateral damage,
> or ethics. Or make it a trillion. The treatment of girls and women in large
> chunks of the world is appalling. What could you fund that would have
> a high probability of changing this altogether within 5-50 years?
Get rid of all the men.
Though I imagine you'll then find some fault with this treatment of men too.
Perhaps this was more out of the box than you were thinking? Maybe
you have a few ideas with which to seed discussion?
More information about the extropy-chat