[ExI] Silence in the sky—but why?
eugen at leitl.org
Mon Aug 26 14:09:46 UTC 2013
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 02:31:11PM +0100, BillK wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> > Yes -- it is being existance. It's either mystery factor
> > X, reliable against astronomical odds, or simply: we're
> > not in anyone's smart lightcone (but our own).
> > Fermi's Paradoxon ain't.
> Look for mystery factor X then.
Careful, Occam's razor is reeeeally sharp.
> The astronomical (!) time-scales mean that we would inevitably be in
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it
> somebody's smart lightcone. The galaxy could have been colonised many
> times over.
And because it isn't, we're not in anyone's smart* light cone.
(* alive and capable of relativistic travel).
I realize that boring explanations are, well, boring. But it
doesn't mean we have to confabulate scenarios just because they're
more exciting. Reality doesn't care for what we want.
More information about the extropy-chat