[ExI] Strong AI Hypothesis: logically flawed?
protokol2020 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 3 15:27:52 UTC 2014
Whatever number it takes to make up most of your forebrain.
Really? How deep this forebrain goes? To the half of brain, or what?
Your view is of no use, utterly!.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:30 PM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>
>> How many cells must die, for me to die?
>> Whatever number it takes to make up most of your forebrain.
> Shades of Korzybski and Hayakawa and general semantics: the map is not
> the territory. It could be argued that all copies are flawed in some way.
> (Pratchett fans will see a parallel in the dwarf's holy hammer.)
> It used to be thought that neurons were never replaced and now that idea
> has gone out the window. But do all neurons get replaced? Dunno. But
> perhaps the deterioration of them and partial replacement account for many
> memory errors over the years (though confabulation probably accounts for
> most). bill w
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat