[ExI] Existential Risks might be underestimated
Dan
danust2012 at gmail.com
Thu May 28 18:30:23 UTC 2015
On May 28, 2015, at 11:16 AM, William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Tara Maya <tara at taramayastales.com> wrote:
>> Again, I’d just like to point out there’s no proof more is not better.
>>
>> You can assert it is not.
>>
>> I hereby assert: More is better. The more humans the better. We don’t have nearly enough yet to even imagine what will become.
>>
>> We are still in the infancy of our sentience and haven’t even left the cradle yet.
>>
>> Tara Maya
>
> Define 'better'. I say we are polluting the planet far more than our species is worth. Fouling our nest, as if we are the only things in the universe worth anything.
Is that the result of more humans or mistaken policies?
Ever read the work of Julian Simon?
Regards,
Dan
Sample my Kindle books via:
http://www.amazon.com/Dan-Ust/e/B00J6HPX8M/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20150528/29d893a3/attachment.html>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list