[ExI] Morphological freedom and its limits

[Tomaz Kristan]

If it looks okay from the inside, it is okay.

If it looks even better from the inside, then it is even better.

If it looks great from the inside, then it's great,

I don't believe it can be better judged or decided than this.



On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Tara Maya <tara at taramayastales.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately, if one makes laws based on a “guilty until proven innocent”
> basis like that, no freedoms will remain.
>
> I propose the opposite. Assume our laws are already sufficient and change
> them only when there is an actual case of evident harm.
>
> Most of what we fear from new technologies would just be hurting people
> with new tools. We don’t need to outlaw the tools if “hurting people”
> regardless of the tools is already illegal.
>
>
> Tara Maya
> Blog  |  Twitter  |  Facebook  |  Amazon  |  Goodreads
>
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2015, at 2:12 PM, BillK <pharos at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > One way to look at it is to come from the other direction and consider
> > all the ways that it could be used for bad purposes. (And then start
> > making laws against these uses).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>



-- 
https://protokol2020.wordpress.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20151116/d6a32b40/attachment.html>