[ExI] Morphological freedom and its limits

[Tara Maya]

> On Nov 16, 2015, at 6:23 PM, Anders Sandberg <anders at aleph.se> wrote:
> 
> A more solid ethical argument (which you bring up below) is whether the enhancement is for the child or for the parents. For general purpose goods like intelligence, health and happiness this seems unproblematic to me, and getting good general species-typical traits like hearing is also useful. It is less clear whether getting entirely new senses and abilities is a good thing: if hearing is better than being deaf, what about seeing UV? We are all UV blind.


Maybe not…   :)

"Monet May Have Been Able To See Ultraviolet Light"

https://curiosity.com/memes/monet-may-have-been-able-to-see-ultraviolet-light-curiosity/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_term=0400&utm_content=meme&utm_campaign=20151114fbmonetaphakia#meme-claude-monet-was-half-honeybee-its-okay-to-be-smart



Tara Maya
Blog  |  Twitter  |  Facebook  |  Amazon  |  Goodreads