[ExI] Bell's Inequality
johnkclark at gmail.com
Thu Dec 15 17:33:25 UTC 2016
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:
> One might view the human brain as a kind of quantum computer, in this
There is not one speck of evidence that the human brain uses any sort of
quantum process in its information processing.
> There is also the question of how quantum computers work. As I
> understand it, they are fed a problem for which there are many
> possible solutions, all of which could in theory be evaluated by
> traditional computers in parallel - if you had enough processors.
To equal a 300 Qbit Quantum Computer you'd need 2^300 processors, and
that's larger than the number of atoms in the observable universe. With a
little luck Google hopes to have a 49 Qbit Quantum Computer up and running
within a year, if so they would achieve quantum supremacy, that means it
could solve some problems that are too big for the largest conventional
supercomputer, even the Tianhe-2 in China that needs 24 megawatts to
John K Clark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat