[ExI] he said what????
johnkclark at gmail.com
Sat Dec 31 15:11:42 UTC 2016
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:01 PM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>> But why couldn't NIST sign it?
>> I send my video to NIST and a few seconds later they send me a file
>> signed with NIST's private key that says "we received your video and made
>> this hash of it at time X". Then if somebody produces a different version
>> of the video with a time stamp later than X on it I can produce the signed
>> hash of the earlier video proving the later one must be
>> of course
>> generally agreed that NIST is honest.
> That's a confusion between "could" and "does".
I'm not confused, I realize NIST doesn't do that but there is no reason
they, or some other trusted third party, couldn't do that.
> there would be no
> obvious reason why NIST should be more trusted to do this
Well, we already trust them to tell us how long a inch is and how much a
pound weighs and how many seconds there are in a year and when to put in a
leap second; and you have to trust somebody.
John K Clark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat