[ExI] Demonstration of Bell's Inequality
atymes at gmail.com
Fri Nov 25 01:11:16 UTC 2016
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:47 PM, John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Adrian Tymes <atymes at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The "three properties"
>> that are independent here are not in fact independent
> That's one possibility
The "three properties" are explicitly different pairings of rotation,
with obvious connections. It's not a possibility they are not
independent, it's straightforward observation.
> There is nothing equivalent to a cosmic Monty saying "the
> other ball was picked only from the blue ones".
There is: the fact that we have a priori knowledge that only one will
be red and one will be blue, and then the scan that shows the first
ball is red.
>> Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
> Actually it isn't.
"Appeal to authority" is listed right there. Granted, this gets into
the question of what authoritative sources there are as to the
definitions of things, but I find Wikipedia, at least, a credible
source on many topics.
More information about the extropy-chat