[ExI] ​T​erminate​ing​ birthright citizenship

William Flynn Wallace foozler83 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 30 17:47:37 UTC 2018


but would anybody like to make the argument that the Supreme Court would be
correct in making such a decision?

John K Clark

Trouble with that:  no appeal.  But the Supreme Court has reversed itself
quite a few times, though not right away.

bill w

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:15 PM John Clark <johnkclark at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:48 PM Darin Sunley <dsunley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > *Is it actually possible for the Supreme Court to be incorrect, by
>> definition? They can be ill-advised, short-sighted, and even
>> self-contradictory, but can they actually be incorrect?*
>>
>
> I would agree that the law is the thing that everybody is forced to obey
> and the law is whatever the Supreme Court says is the law. But if being
> self-contradictory isn't incorrect then I don't know what you mean by
> "correct".
>
>   John K Clark
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20181030/d2f3b3f6/attachment.html>


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list