[ExI] spike and chess
atymes at gmail.com
Fri May 17 00:25:03 UTC 2019
In the other direction, how long will it be until it is convenient to
calculate literally every position, move, et cetera - all paths a chess
game can possibly take - so there is the option of reducing chess to a
Not an option many would want involved in their own games, of course. But
just so the option is there.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:02 PM William Flynn Wallace <foozler83 at gmail.com>
> chess programs got to where they were just as creative, imaginative,
> artistic and all that as the best humans, in fact… better. So… apparently
> chess doesn’t require intelligence. spike
> This is preposterous - Why can't what the chess computer is doing be
> intelligent? Because you define that what it is doing not intelligence.
> It seems really out of step when you consider that chess geniuses are
> generally pretty high IQ people to start with. I think you just don't want
> to call it intelligent and are wiggling around out of calling it that. For
> my money, creative, inventive, excellent recall all point to superior
> Here's an idea: restrict the chess computer to the memory level of a
> great chess player - even the field. Recalling millions of games is an
> unfair advantage, it seems to me.
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat