[ExI] bond villain?

Fri Feb 3 17:39:32 UTC 2023

…> On Behalf Of Adrian Tymes via extropy-chat
Subject: Re: [ExI] bond villain?

On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 7:31 AM spike jones via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org <mailto:extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> > wrote:

Then I listened to what Walker said on the video.  He talks like a doctor.  So now I have doubts about my doubts.

>…This is where you erred.  Phonies can talk like a doctor, easily.  But all the hard evidence you had said he was a phony.  Him talking like a doctor should not override this. 

OK no worries Adrian, there is no hurry to get answers.  I noticed the buzz over on Twitter isn’t dying away, it is still heating up.  That part 3 video put a match to a powder keg.  Eventually we will find out if Dr(?) Walker is a real doctor and if he ever worked for Pfizer, and in what capacity.

There is a reason why I take particular interest in this, especially since he mentioned menstrual cycles.  If you have nearly any prescription medication and google on the name of that medication, you will get a safety sheet listing all the reasons why you shouldn’t take that medication, all the bad things that can happen to you if you do, all the stuff they found in the lengthy expensive qualification process, and in nearly all those meds you will find a comment such as “do not use this medication if you are pregnant or might become pregnant.”

That last part doesn’t mean they found some harm it does to a fetus, but rather they didn’t have nearly enough data to prove that it doesn’t harm a fetus.  Since that is a small-ish market segment, the drug companies don’t even bother trying to determine if their medication somehow interferes with pregnancy.  They just cover their asses with the warning and sell the stuff to everyone else.  I don’t know how else they could do it.

Result: pregnant women often get prescription meds yanked away from them.  This can have negative consequences in itself but no details will be offered on that comment.  Do let me assure you however.

So… in general, prescription medications warn against pregnant women using it, but… there was a new experimental vaccine introduced in early 2021 which didn’t do that.  With little or no data on its effect on pregnant women, it fearlessly introduced the meds.  Well… “fearlessly” is perhaps the wrong term, given blanket immunity from all legal liability.  HEY such a deal, profits assured, no liability, legal or civil, can’t lose.

But wait, there’s more.  Many companies (and the US military) not only allowed pregnant women to take this experimental medication, they required it.  Oh dear evolution.  

My friend owns an engineering firm.  One of her employees told her she was pregnant, but would take the vaccine if the company required it because she needed to keep her job.  If any harm came to her baby, she would sue that company to the cufflinks.  My wise friend told her never mind, she wasn’t required to take the vaccine.  She had the young mother sign a paper acknowledging that her company was not requiring her to get the vaccine.

Note that none of that has anything to do with politics, or if so, not partisan politics (the world where there are two sides.)  I don’t inhabit that world, for in my world there are more than two sides.  I am neutral toward the vaccine, took two of them myself, voluntarily.  In my world, requiring people to take *any* experimental vaccine is wrong, flat wrong, morally reprehensible, evil to the rotten core.  Requiring anyone to take that vaccine to keep a job is unambiguously wrong.  Requiring pregnant women to take an experimental vaccine is beyond evil, because we don’t know what it is doing to that fetus, and may never know.

So now, we wait.  Dr(?) Walker’s even mentioning the reproductive cycle raised so many red flags, we are lost in a dense red-flag forest.

spike

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230203/f2266c9b/attachment.htm>