[ExI] lancet publishes information

[Dylan Distasio]

I agree that native mRNA degrades rapidly and is inherently unstable .
 However, I'm not sure if you're aware of it, but the mRNA in the vaccines
is not the same as naturally occurring mRNA.   It has purposely been
modified to increase stability, and there is evidence that it persists much
longer than expected as a result of that tinkering.   Uridine has been
replaced with N1-methyl-pseudouridine-modified mRNA in the chain.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.789427/full

There are reports of it still being detectable in the blood at 15 days, and
I have seen other publications that saw evidence of it in tissues 90 days
out.

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/10/7/1538/pdf


On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 1:50 PM Stuart LaForge via extropy-chat <
extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:

> >
> > It was also obvious from the beginning that there was a high risk of
> > nanoparticles not staying in the local injection site.   I raised this
> > concern on other lists as soon as I heard about the tech, and
> > unfortunately, I was right to be concerned.   The animal data buried in
> the
> > initial application that was hidden from the public for months showed
> > animals lighting up like a Christmas tree throughout their bodies with
> mRNA
> > post-injection.
>
> Well obviously that was a risk that the medical community was willing
> to let their patients take for them. That being said, mRNA is meant to
> self-destruct after it does its job. Rnases, which are enzymes that
> destroy mRNA are found everywhere in the body and are actually present
> everywhere in the environment which is why mRNA so unstable.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230218/1c2b0930/attachment.htm>