[ExI] (no subject)

[Keith Henson]

I know this is an unpopular view here, but humans evolved for wars.
Turns out that genes do better in a resource crisis by killing
neighbors and taking their resources than they do by starving in
place.  (The reason genes do better is that the winners absorb the
young women of the losers and through them the genes of the dead
warriors.)

The most divergent humans, the San people, may have missed this
selection.  But of the ones who left Africa, the cycle is for the
population to expand until there is a resource crisis, then a war,
then another expansion.  Rinse, repeat.

Keith

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 8:50 AM William Flynn Wallace via extropy-chat
<extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>  I think the simplest explanation is that ultimately, there are no morals. They are created when several self-conscious, human beings meet reality.
>
> This is about as vague as you can get.  Reality is that we cannot live alone effectively.  So when someone in a group harms another, the whole group suffers - loss of warrior; loss of berry picker; loss of spear chunker, and so on. What hurts an individual hurts the group.  Matthew Ridley has a whole book on the subject of how morality forms.    All of his books are excellent, like The Rational Optimist.    bill w
>
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:43 AM efc--- via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Brent,
>>
>> On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, Brent Allsop via extropy-chat wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:25 PM efc--- via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>> >       On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, Gadersd via extropy-chat wrote:
>> >       >> ask about why we want to live a long time.
>> >       >
>> >       > That seems an odd thing to have to explain. Life is good, no?
>> >
>> >       I always find these immortality discussions very strange. For me, it is
>> >       not about immortality per se, but about choice. Being able to decide
>> >       yourself when you had enough.
>> >
>> > Being about choice is a good point.  But if that is the only point, are you saying that morality is relative, or that there is no
>> > morality, right or wrong, good or bad... choice?
>>
>> Good question! On the surface, I am all about freedom and free informed
>> consent and very libertarian.
>>
>> On a deeper level, which I find more interesting, I think the simplest
>> explanation that ultimately, there are no morals. They are created when
>> several self-conscious, human beings meet reality.
>>
>> I do not have a hard position on this, so I welcome a vigorous debate
>> here to inspire me! =)
>>
>> > Seems to me choosing to end things is necessarily a bad/wrong/mistaken... choice.
>>
>> Why? It is your life, and given the circumstances, why should you not be
>> allowed to choose to end it if you so want and are of a sound and
>> healthy mind?
>>
>> > Seems to me, survival is always, necessarily, better than not surviving.  That is why evolution must progress in all sufficiently
>> > complex worlds?
>>
>> I can imagine many situations where I would probably choose to end my
>> life. So I do not think, for me, that survival trumps everything,
>> everytime.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
>> extropy-chat mailing list
>> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat