[ExI] (no subject)

[efc at swisscows.email]

Thank you very much for the book recommendation Bill!

I just wanted to add to the example below, that sometimes the removal of 
one individual can benefit the whole group as well. Let's save an insane 
serial killer.

That in turn can open the door to "what brought about the mentality", 
treatment vs punishment vs permanenet removal.

All interesting discussions.

Best regards,
Daniel


On Mon, 19 Jun 2023, William Flynn Wallace via extropy-chat wrote:

>  I think the simplest explanation is that ultimately, there are no morals. They are created when several self-conscious, human beings
> meet reality.
> 
> This is about as vague as you can get.  Reality is that we cannot live alone effectively.  So when someone in a group harms another,
> the whole group suffers - loss of warrior; loss of berry picker; loss of spear chunker, and so on. What hurts an individual hurts the
> group.  Matthew Ridley has a whole book on the subject of how morality forms.    All of his books are excellent, like The Rational
> Optimist.    bill w
> 
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 9:43 AM efc--- via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>       Hello Brent,
>
>       On Sat, 17 Jun 2023, Brent Allsop via extropy-chat wrote:
>
>       > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:25 PM efc--- via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>       >       On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, Gadersd via extropy-chat wrote:
>       >       >> ask about why we want to live a long time.
>       >       >
>       >       > That seems an odd thing to have to explain. Life is good, no?
>       >
>       >       I always find these immortality discussions very strange. For me, it is
>       >       not about immortality per se, but about choice. Being able to decide
>       >       yourself when you had enough.
>       >
>       > Being about choice is a good point.  But if that is the only point, are you saying that morality is relative, or that
>       there is no
>       > morality, right or wrong, good or bad... choice?
>
>       Good question! On the surface, I am all about freedom and free informed
>       consent and very libertarian.
>
>       On a deeper level, which I find more interesting, I think the simplest
>       explanation that ultimately, there are no morals. They are created when
>       several self-conscious, human beings meet reality.
>
>       I do not have a hard position on this, so I welcome a vigorous debate
>       here to inspire me! =)
>
>       > Seems to me choosing to end things is necessarily a bad/wrong/mistaken... choice.
>
>       Why? It is your life, and given the circumstances, why should you not be
>       allowed to choose to end it if you so want and are of a sound and
>       healthy mind?
>
>       > Seems to me, survival is always, necessarily, better than not surviving.  That is why evolution must progress in all
>       sufficiently
>       > complex worlds?
>
>       I can imagine many situations where I would probably choose to end my
>       life. So I do not think, for me, that survival trumps everything,
>       everytime.
>
>       Best regards,
>       Daniel
>       _______________________________________________
>       extropy-chat mailing list
>       extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
>       http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
> 
> 
>