[ExI] ChatGPT 'Not Interesting' for creative works

[spike at rainier66.com]

…> On Behalf Of Mike Dougherty via extropy-chat
Subject: Re: [ExI] ChatGPT 'Not Interesting' for creative works

 

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, 8:07 PM Gadersd via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org <mailto:extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> > wrote:

 

No, the small models generate output faster than the big models. The small models are not slower version of the big models, they have completely different capabilities. You will never be able to get ChatGPT level output out of a much smaller model. It would be like trying to run modern engineering software on an Atari console: it wouldn’t be slower it just wouldn’t run at all.

 

>…Or weather prediction using only one weather station? Or a single environmental reading (such as temperature or barometric pressure)? Mike

 

 

I think of it more as a weather prediction using all the stations and readings but the model takes a year to calculate a prediction for tomorrow.  The year-old prediction is useless of course, but the idea is to compensate for the limited calculation ability and bandwidth by giving it more time.  

 

One way or another, we need to be able to personalize GPT.  Otherwise we can’t really use it to replace most of the staff of our company.  We are stuck with carbon units using ChatGPT to do their jobs, which means a dozen investors owning and controlling whatever our employees are doing with their product.  

 

spike

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230306/6acd964e/attachment.htm>