[ExI] but will it be sued
Gadersd
gadersd at gmail.com
Mon Mar 20 01:22:04 UTC 2023
Whether or not GPT4 gets a license matters little to me as I’ll just use it anyway. It costs about $40k to hire a lawyer to handle the paperwork to start a hedge fund. If GPT4 can do the job for $20 a month then that is a win in my book. One of the great benefits of these models not being human is that they can’t be punished for working without a license. Once they start going truly open source there won’t be any truly effective way for the government to regulate them.
> On Mar 16, 2023, at 11:03 PM, spike jones via extropy-chat <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> OK so ChatGPT-4 can pass the bar. Does it get a license? And if not, but it is caught, can it be charged for practicing law without a license?
>
> https://reason.com/volokh/2023/03/15/in-january-chatgpt-failed-the-bar-in-march-gpt-4-exceeds-the-student-average/?utm_medium=email <https://reason.com/volokh/2023/03/15/in-january-chatgpt-failed-the-bar-in-march-gpt-4-exceeds-the-student-average/?utm_medium=email>
>
> And how would we know if a lawyer is really ChatGPT? Lawyers will take a case on commission if they think it is worth the chance at a payoff. But ChatGPT wouldn’t care whether or not it gets paid, because it doesn’t either way. So a person with ChatGPT could sue anyone for anything and just try the shotgun approach hoping for a payout.
>
> Do we have any actual lawyers among us who might comment?
>
> spike
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org <mailto:extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat <http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230319/c0196d84/attachment.htm>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list