[ExI] Elon Musk, Emad Mostaque, and other AI leaders sign open letter to 'Pause Giant AI Experiments'

[Gordon Swobe]

Having been away from ExI for so long, I did not know until recently (or
perhaps I had forgotten) that Eliezer had taken such a hard line on this
subject. He didn't sign as he thinks it does not go far enough. He says we
should destroy rogue datacenters by airstrike.

TIME Magazine, today March 29.
"Shut down all the large GPU clusters (the large computer farms where the
most powerful AIs are refined). Shut down all the large training runs. Put
a ceiling on how much computing power anyone is allowed to use in training
an AI system, and move it downward over the coming years to compensate for
more efficient training algorithms. No exceptions for anyone, including
governments and militaries. Make immediate multinational agreements to
prevent the prohibited activities from moving elsewhere. Track all GPUs
sold. If intelligence says that a country outside the agreement is building
a GPU cluster, be less scared of a shooting conflict between nations than
of the moratorium being violated; be willing to destroy a rogue datacenter
by airstrike."
-Eliezer Yudkowsky

https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 12:11 AM Gordon Swobe <gordon.swobe at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I agree and am glad to see this development. As I have argued here, these
> language models literally have no idea what they are talking about. They
> have mastered the structures of language but have no grounding. They are
> blind software applications with no idea of the meanings of the words and
> sentences they generate. If they were human, we would call them sophists.
>
> From the letter:
>
> --
> Contemporary AI systems are now becoming human-competitive at general
> tasks,[3] and we must ask ourselves: Should we let machines flood our
> information channels with propaganda and untruth? Should we automate away
> all the jobs, including the fulfilling ones? Should we develop nonhuman
> minds that might eventually outnumber, outsmart, obsolete and replace us?
> Should we risk loss of control of our civilization? Such decisions must not
> be delegated to unelected tech leaders. Powerful AI systems should be
> developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive
> and their risks will be manageable. This confidence must be well justified
> and increase with the magnitude of a system's potential effects. OpenAI's
> recent statement regarding artificial general intelligence, states that "At
> some point, it may be important to get independent review before starting
> to train future systems, and for the most advanced efforts to agree to
> limit the rate of growth of compute used for creating new models." We
> agree. That point is now.
>
>
> Therefore, we call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6
> months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This pause
> should be public and verifiable, and include all key actors. If such a
> pause cannot be enacted quickly, governments should step in and institute a
> moratorium.
> --
> https://twitter.com/SmokeAwayyy/status/1640906401408225280?s=20
>
> -gts
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20230329/530db79c/attachment.htm>