[extropy-chat] Using Graphic controllers
eugen at leitl.org
Sun Apr 18 19:55:14 UTC 2004
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 12:50:07PM -0400, David Lubkin wrote:
> When a technical term is incorrect, or discovery/invention is
> misattributed, the scientific and engineering communities have often
> changed their terminology as evidence has warranted.
I specifically used a "in the widest" sense modifier. Von Neumann has a
specific use, similiar to Harvard architecture. I informally lumped them
together to denote a "large, dumb data/instruction store" and "small,
smart processing mill" as set apart to "small cells, simple state, local
synchronous, globally asynchronous operation". There's a continuum between
these both, of course, but current architectures tend to ride the extremes.
> Whether *they* do or not in this case, I encourage *you* and others on the
> list to use the phrase "EDVAC design," both because it is more accurate and
> out of whatever respect you have for me, much as I credit Robin with idea
> futures or Arthur Kantrowitz with laser launching.
I don't care much either way, but I'd put John Brunner's "Shockwave Rider" as
strong prior art for idea futures.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the extropy-chat