[extropy-chat] Re: extropy-chat Digest, Vol 7, Issue 18
Amara Graps
amara at amara.com
Tue Apr 20 10:42:17 UTC 2004
Chris Phoenix <cphoenix at CRNano.org>:
>Even scientists reject observations all the time. They read the data
>differently. They assert that there must be errors in the method.
yes, true
>They
>attack the credentials of the observer. They change the subject. They
>build strawman attacks, and frequently even appear to convince
>themselves. They form cliques. They tell their students not to even
>read the claims, and certainly not to investigate them.
to be fair, I don't think that this is the norm. Yes, it happens,
but it is not the common way that scientists (that I know, anyway)
think about and solve problems.
Amara
--
********************************************************************
Amara Graps, PhD email: amara at amara.com
Computational Physics vita: ftp://ftp.amara.com/pub/resume.txt
Multiplex Answers URL: http://www.amara.com/
********************************************************************
"I do not know." -- Joseph Louis Lagrange [summarizing his life's work]
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list