[extropy-chat] The Simulation Argument
John K Clark
jonkc at att.net
Fri Dec 3 17:31:21 UTC 2004
"Robin Hanson" <rhanson at gmu.edu>
> The many worlds interpretation does not require an infinity
> of worlds or beings.
Yes but it's not clear to me that it forbids an infinity of worlds either.
And even if Many Worlds is wrong there could still be an infinite number of
real super civilizations; the observable universe is finite but the entire
universe is certainly much larger, possibly infinitely larger.
John K Clark jonkc at att.net
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list