[extropy-chat] Politics: US talks of suspending elections
dgc at cox.net
Mon Jul 12 21:07:41 UTC 2004
Brian Lee wrote:
> Isn't it pretty pointless for a newsource to quote "unnamed sources".
> What proves that they exist. I've noticed this a lot lately with
> "unnamed sources close to xyz". This could be Tom Ridge speaking off
> the record or a janitor.
> There have been quite a few cases of news fabrication lately. I
> disregard any story that won't name who is providing the information.
Newsweek is effectively the same organization as the Washington Post.
They are not perfect, and they are not unbiased. However, they do try
fairly hard to validate their sources. I trust them a lot more than I
trust the Bush administration. I suggest you re-read "All the
President's Men." That is the book about the Watergate affair.
Two additional points:
1) There has been no denial from the administration.
2) As I said earlier, someone in government really should be thinking
In my opinion, our society needs to de-politicize this discussion to the
extent possible, and try hard for consensus. We need to quickly list the
things we can all agree on immediately, and list any areas of
disagreement. This issue is far too important to use in support of
dogmatic positions of any type. Unfortunately, we are now so badly
polarized that there is nobody left in the middle to bring us together.
More information about the extropy-chat