[extropy-chat] Nietzsche on Religion Incorporated
Gennady Ra
anyservice at cris.crimea.ua
Fri Nov 5 14:57:48 UTC 2004
At 09:23 AM 11/4/04 -0600, you wrote:
>At 07:00 AM 11/4/2004 -0800, the Spikester wrote:
>>Isn't it shocking? Religion Incorporated seems
>>to be making a raging comeback in our modern world.
Damien Broderick replied:
>In all sorts of brands and guises. It's bitterly ironic (to me, anyway) that avowedly hi-tech widely educated societies such as the USA and Russia have so many citizens reaching for the god pill, while their antagonists are swigging madly from the god bottle, all factions boiling away with contrived and almost arbitrary iconologies of bigotry.
The key phrase:
>It starts to look as if people really *do* find secular scientific cultures too `cold' and `impersonal' and even `inhaman' to sustain the glow of life.
>True, there are parts of Europe and Australasia where Religion Incorporated has been sidelined for a few generations, but I'll bet it comes ripping back in the clutches. Time for humanism and transhumanism to start thinking seriously once again (as Bertrand Russell and Wells and others did nearly a century ago, without getting anywhere) about some sort of secular equivalent of worship (ugh; whatever) and mutually supportive emotionally enriched fellowship. But I don't imagine it will emerge from any bunch of INTJs like this list...
>Damien Broderick
From Human, All Too Human, Section V,
Signs of Higher and Lower Culture, 251
http://www.underthesun.cc/Nietzsche/Human/Human259.html
Future of science. To the man who works and searches in it, science gives
much pleasure; to the man who learns its results, very little. But since all
important scientific truths must eventually become everyday and commonplace,
even this small amount of pleasure ceases; just as we have long ago ceased
to enjoy learning the admirable multiplication tables. Now, if science
produces ever less joy in itself and takes ever greater joy in casting
suspicion on the comforts of metaphysics, religion, and art, then the
greatest source of pleasure, to which mankind owes almost its whole
humanity, is impoverished. Therefore a higher culture must give man a
double brain, two brain chambers, as it were, one to experience science, and
one to experience nonscience. Lying next to one another, without confusion,
separable, self-contained: our health demands this. In the one domain lies
the source of strength, in the other the regulator. Illusions, biases,
passions must give heat; with the help of scientific knowledge, the
pernicious and dangerous consequences of overheating must be prevented.
If this demand made by higher culture is not satisfied, we can almost
certainly predict the further course of human development: interest in truth
will cease, the less it gives pleasure; illusion, error, and fantasies,
because they are linked with pleasure, will reconquer their former territory
step by step; the ruin of the sciences and relapse into barbarism follow
next. Mankind will have to begin to weave its cloth from the beginning
again, after having, like Penelope, destroyed it in the night. But who will
guarantee that we will keep finding the strength to do so?
====
Best!
Gennady
Simferopol Crimea Ukraine
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list