[extropy-chat] Enlightenment and the election

Paul carbone vanvidum at msn.com
Tue Nov 9 23:56:19 UTC 2004


>From: Mike Lorrey <mlorrey at yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: ExI chat list <extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
>To: Kevin Freels <cmcmortgage at sbcglobal.net>,   ExI chat list 
><extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org>
>Subject: Re: [extropy-chat] Enlightenment and the election
>Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:14:34 -0800 (PST)
> > Mike, I've been wanting to ask you...What is your take on NH? Why do
> > you think it went to Kerry?

>
>a) Kerry bussed in 25,000 "campaign workers" on election day.
>b) 15% of voters registered on election day (we are just starting that
>investigation, which may result in prosecutions all the way to the top)
>c) Kerry is from Massachusetts
>d) Vermont's Howard Dean built up a lot of support here which
>translated to Kerry
>e) The Democrats created an illegal unregistered PAC called the "Clean
>Ballot Project" whose sole aim was to keep all serious third party
>candidates off the ballot. They kept the Constitution Party off, they
>kept almost all of the LPNH candidates off, and nearly kept Nader off
>but he had more money and better lawyers and exposed the scam, which
>the media never reported on. The dems sent teams of people to the homes
>of petition signers to strong arm them into recinding their signatures.
>They wanted to give anti-war voters only one choice: Kerry.
>f) the media never reported on any of the other democrat dirty tricks
>and criminal activities here in this election.

I would suggest that continued movement from MA to NH between the elections 
contributed. Rather ironic, Massachusettsites try to escape our own stagnant 
state, only to drag down our more vibrant neighbor.





More information about the extropy-chat mailing list