[extropy-chat] Reductionism
Jef Allbright
jef at jefallbright.net
Fri Nov 26 22:30:33 UTC 2004
Eliezer Yudkowsky wrote:
> Samantha Atkins wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> > Furthermore, I don't believe that you fully and consistently believe
>>> > this either.
>>>
>>> Them's fighting words, Samantha.
>>
>>
>> By this I mean that you too make and must make use of various tools
>> and assumptions that you cannot fully reduce in order to function at
>> all in the world. There is no need to fight over an obvious
>> truth. :-)
>
>
> Name me a single concept I must use, for which I cannot give an
> experimentally testable consequence of its presence or absence.
>
Small child to parent: "Why *can't* I cross the big road if I'm careful?"
Teenage daughter to parent: "Why *can't* I spend the night at my
boyfriend's house"
Aspiring young genius to the worldwide community: "Why don't you
understand that *my* ideas are humanity's best hope for survival"
Superhuman AI to dependent humans: "Because I said so."
- Jef
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list