[extropy-chat] IRAQ: Weapons pipeline to Syria
RobKPO
trichrom at optusnet.com.au
Fri Oct 29 23:51:03 UTC 2004
Yikes, can't wait for the US election to be over...
In an environment of an pre-existing violently oppressive/criminal
government being confronted and then engaged in open and urban conflict, how
do you determine the circumstance of who was killed an by whom. Both sides
were shooting and the US/Coalition forces have much more C2I then the
Iraqis - not to mention an actual effort of adherance to the Geneva
convention. These day's the insurgency style conflict clearly has Iraqi's
killing Iraqi's.
If Iraq were a peaceful people invaded by a giant army then you could count
the deaths and blame the invader's but that is purely fantasy.
Deliberatly supporting information that effectively is enemy propaganda
(whether correct or not) will always get most people upset during a war,
moreso if it is wrong, even more so if it is blatantly wrong.
What is accurate? I don't know but that figure seems awfully high for how
the invasion/liberation was prosecuted, and very open to inaccuracies based
on reports I've read from Iraq tactics regarding their style of fighting and
use of civilian's....
Blaming your leader because their is a war might make you feel good but it
is hardly a positive effort for personal growth.
How about accuracy, empathy, and awareness that the public will not be told
everything regarding strategic decision making. The office of President is
probably something that is quite effective in the long run despite the
personal cost many decision's might cause but it is not a public decision
forum - the public only get's to vote who is in that position.
So is enemy propoganda during a war considered part of free speech in the
US, and I wonder what the US government should do to limit misinformation
that incite's internal anti-US influence's during time of war and subsequant
insecurity of benefit to enemy intent?
Rob KPO
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list