[extropy-chat] Make that Irrational [was Still Stingy]
Samantha Atkins
sjatkins at gmail.com
Thu Jan 6 10:39:22 UTC 2005
ohmigod, the end times! Now that just about explains every little
thing! Pass the beer and the popcorn sister. We have us ringside
seats!
<sheesh>
-s
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:21:08 -0800, Olga Bourlin <fauxever at sprynet.com> wrote:
>
> From: "Samantha Atkins" <sjatkins at mac.com>
>
> > I reject the fundamental premise that one is morally obligated to help
> > persons one does not know in any and all difficulties. However, you
> > make a quite good point that we do not adequately support research into
> > real killers that we can do something about before the fact. I would
> > not call this "stingy" so much as irrational.
>
> Yes, now THAT - *irrationality* - we've got in droves.
>
> Has anyone checked out the Fox television network recently? It is chilling
> to realize that here we are - in 2004 C.E. - and the discussion on
> Scarborough (and there's nothing "fair" there) last night was "end times."
> Ahem ... as in did god(s)(esses) have anything to do with the tsunamis (and,
> if so, was this one of the signs of the end times)? The guests were
> certifiable nut cases, and yet the host listened politely and offered
> commentary on their deranged ravings. *Who* listens to this stuff? I mean,
> seriously ...
>
> More and more, it seems, we are inhabiting a Jerry Springer universe.
> Observe: we elected our official Jerry Springer President #1 again.
>
> Olga
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo/extropy-chat
>
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list