[extropy-chat] What % of global economic activity is dependant on military activity?
Dirk Bruere
dirk at neopax.com
Fri Jun 10 20:23:24 UTC 2005
Lifespan Pharma Inc. wrote:
> What I mean is to delineate the point of diminishing returns at which
> testing out technology by military enterprises no longer serves the
> purpose
> of yielding information from which to make more durable or efficient
> or yield improved technological innovations.
>
> Putting AK47's and and landmines cannot possibly yield much towards an
> improved human condition.
> Putting up a GPS satellite network does improve the human condition in
> measureable ways.
>
> One could begin to classify global military activity into a spectrum
> and rate the
> societal or other benefits, short, medium and long term of these
> activities.
>
> This like QALY ratings for medical intervention economics might yield
> a cost/benefit
> system for military activity economics.
>
> This might allow rationalization of global military economics.
The problem is that actually deploying weapons has no economic benefit
whatsoever - just the reverse.
If, say, the military obsession was replaced by a space colonisation
obsession I think we would see all the benefits we currently get from
military spending plus a 'deployment benefit' of vast magnitude.
--
Dirk
The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.6.6 - Release Date: 08/06/2005
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list