[extropy-chat] Wetware vs. Hardware (was IQ vs Upload)
Keith Henson
hkhenson at rogers.com
Sat Jun 25 14:35:44 UTC 2005
At 03:10 AM 22/06/05 +0100, you wrote:
>Keith Henson wrote:
snip
>>I remember looking into this when it was reported. At the time I
>>remarked how the surface area of his brain seems to be the important parameter.
>>
>>This is consistent with William Calvin's analysis that the hexagonal
>>spaced cortical column is the "element of computation" in brains. I ran
>>a computation--which is probably can be found if someone looks--assuming
>>that each of these columns could be modeled and connected to its
>>neighbors by a 1 cm square silicon processor. I seem to remember it was
>>something like 150 meters on a side square of processors to simulate a
>>human brain this way.
>ie 22500 sq metres.
>Given Moore's Law and 25yrs that reduces to about 0.3 sq metres, or a chip
>approx 60cm on edge.
>Or something rather more compact if we use wafer scale integration and
>stacking.
Yeah. It might fit inside the volume of a human skull. Imagine that.
Keith Henson
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list