[extropy-chat] The Proactionary Principle: comments encouraged on almost-final version

[Dirk Bruere]

On 11/8/05, Max More <max at maxmore.com> wrote:
>
> At 01:05 PM 11/8/2005, Hal wrote:
>
> >I agree with Chris that it is a little awkward to have a list of four
> >imperative points here, as an introduction to a list of ten points
> >(confusion exacerbated by the earlier claim that there will be seven
> >points!).
>
> Hal -- the seven referred to the number of points in the earlier
> version, for which I gave the URL. The version I posted does say "ten".
>
> I'll hold back my other responses for now. Please keep those
> productive comments coming.
>
> Onward!


Only one suggestion.
That is, when this is finalised you do a highly condensed version which is
essntially nothing but bullet points and soundbites.
Something that can be appreciated at a glance (or at least in less than
twenty seconds for someone of our reading speed).

Dirk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20051108/03fd9821/attachment.html>