[extropy-chat] Qualia Bet.
eugen at leitl.org
Fri Nov 25 08:03:54 UTC 2005
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 08:27:37PM -0500, gts wrote:
> >But it can't observe itself making that measurement.
> Right, that would require self-awareness. I'm not suggesting molecules are
> self-aware, just aware.
You've just redefined "aware". Even the measurement part
is a stretch: a molecule is a single detector at best.
> Robotic insects already exist. I wonder if they are in any fundamental way
> different from real insects. Other than the difference in materials, and
Statues of people exist. I wonder if they are in any fundamental way
different from real people.
> the ability to mate and reproduce, aren't they basically the same as real
> insects? If not, exactly how are they different?
An insect has to survive and reproduce in a hostile environment, sensing
multichannel input and making choices. Mechanical insects are to real
thing is roughly what 18th century androids are to real people.
AI people are having a hard time even reproducing isolated insect skills,
and the footprint and power requirements to do so are a fair cry of
mm^3 and microwatts of insects.
> To me insects look like little flying cameras.
You're obviously no biologist. You need way more bits to describe
an insect than a camera obscura.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a>
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the extropy-chat