[extropy-chat] Extropy and libertarianism

[Dirk Bruere]

On 9/12/05, Natasha Vita-More <natasha at natasha.cc> wrote:
> 
> At 05:11 PM 9/11/2005, Damien wrote:
> 
> At 08:31 AM 9/10/2005 -0500, Natasha Vita-More wrote:
> 
> Dirk,
> 
> I think it would be best if you respected the communications already sent 
> to this list and published elsewhere regarding Extropy Institute.
> 
> 
> Coming in late on this, I find myself baffled by what Natasha meant. Is 
> that sentence to be read as:
> 
> A) I think it would be best if you respected (the communications already 
> sent to this list and published elsewhere regarding Extropy Institute).
> 
> Or
> 
> B) I think it would be best if you (respected the communications already 
> sent to this list) and published elsewhere regarding Extropy Institute.
> 
> The second reading -- which is how I read it originally -- suggests that 
> he should go elsewhere with his opinions. Perhaps this was not intended?
> 
> 
> 
> No you are incorrect. The first is the proper reading. I think that if 
> Dirk should reread what Max has written on the topic, and the links Max 
> provided in one of his posts about the topic in an interview he did this 
> year.
> 
> I'm less interested in Max's views than about the scope for disagreement 
within ExI and here.

Dirk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20050912/3686eeae/attachment.html>