[extropy-chat] Reading "The Singularity is Near"
Brian Atkins
brian at posthuman.com
Thu Sep 22 05:56:02 UTC 2005
Hi Reason,
It's been a few days since I read the book, but here's a few quick thoughts:
1. In the first part of your message you seem to be discussing complexity in
general, and whether it will become too much. Didn't K specifically address this
common objection in one of the latter sections of his book? Do you have specific
complaints about his ideas there?
2. For most of the leadup to the Singularity, it doesn't really require shorter
turnarounds in human-centric business practices does it? For instance, for
Moore's Law to continue all we need is that the existing business flow of
releasing new processes/chip designs continue every 18 months or so. So I'm not
sure what you're getting at - the trends in the technologies needed to achieve
his human-enhancement timelines do not require anything more than "business as
usual" as far as I see.
3. Later, very close to the Singularity, there may be a natural speed up in
business processes simply because by that time, if you buy into K's scenario,
there will be upgraded humans and also post-Turing AIs, or some mix of those
that he envisions working together to move even faster and think even bigger
thoughts. So, essentially by reaching this point in technology it can be used to
move past the human-centric barriers you are discussing.
BTW, even though I'm relatively young, I do a good variety of things for my
health, and additionally am signed up for cryonics. I completely agree with you
that nothing should be assumed, and covering all bases is fully rational.
--
Brian Atkins
Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
http://www.singinst.org/
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list