[extropy-chat] Forbes Magazine on Robotics
Keith Henson
hkhenson at rogers.com
Sun Aug 20 19:08:50 UTC 2006
At 02:16 PM 8/20/2006 -0400, Martin wrote:
snip
>I've been trying to promote alternative energy as a transhumanist
>issue for a while now. Hopefully people are starting to connect the
>dots. All our magic technologies have to run on something, so a
>transhumanist future is necessarily a Green future.
The trouble is, human demand for energy is so high that small scale
solutions just won't do it. The potential for wind energy, for example,
isn't large enough. Fossil fuels won't last, and it would take on the
order of ten thousand new nuclear plants to displace them. Power sats
could tap enough energy to displace all the coal and nuclear plants.
>That being said, I don't think alternative energy will make the
>greatest impact within the *10 years.*
You are probably right. But without a massive start in the next ten years
a substantial fraction of the current population is likely to die in the
next 20 years from starvation or wars from the effects of a looming bleak
future.
>Out of that list, my vote
>would be wireless networking. There's no reason why Bill Gates'
>conception of networked home appliances couldn't happen within the
>next 10 years.
I just can't see a toaster able to burn an image of Jesus into bread having
that much of an impact on my life.
Keith Henson
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list