[extropy-chat] Brent and Natasha's thoughts
hkhenson at rogers.com
Wed Dec 27 21:00:25 UTC 2006
At 02:36 PM 12/27/2006 -0600, you wrote:
>At 01:29 PM 12/27/2006 -0500, Keith wrote:
> >The fact is that we are not (yet) transhumanists, just the
> >evolved social primates known as "humans."
>Au contraire. This is a misunderstanding of the now-established >H
>usage. We *are* transhumanists. We are not, however, as yet,
>transhuman, let alone posthuman.
Sorry, typo, meant to write "transhuman." Thanks for catching it.
"sort of an ur-transhumanist"
More information about the extropy-chat