[extropy-chat] the structure of randomness

[Damien Broderick]

At 05:43 PM 1/2/2006 -0500, gts wrote:

>No stats were given but from his words it seems the result is robust.
>(He is a bit worried about the stretching operation but that can't
>explain the results; it is worrying from a physics perspective though).

I'm more worried about the optional chirality rotation, which seems bogus 
without a *lot* of justification.

Damien Broderick