[extropy-chat] [ASTRO] Stars and X-Rays
Amara Graps
amara at amara.com
Wed May 31 19:18:26 UTC 2006
>Amara (or anyone else): I think I've read, somewhere, that the Sun is
>fairly low in X-ray output, not just compared to M-stars or O-stars but
>even to other G-stars, though I've never seen why. Does this sound
>familiar, and you expand upon or correct it?
It didn't sound familiar, but then my magazine and journal reading queue
is very high and so easy to miss this item.
I made a quick search and I found this:
http://aanda.u-strasbg.fr:2002/papers/aa/full/2001/07/aa10283/aa10283.html
which seems like it could be what you were talking about. The paper
compares the stars Capella and Procyon (solar-like stars), to our Sun in
X-rays using Chandra data. The stars have a one magnitude larger X-ray
output, which the authors conclude is due to larger "corona filling factors".
(no time to expand upon)
Amara
--
********************************************************************
Amara Graps, PhD email: amara at amara.com
Computational Physics vita: ftp://ftp.amara.com/pub/resume.txt
Multiplex Answers URL: http://www.amara.com/
********************************************************************
"Looking up gives light, although at first it makes you dizzy."
--Mevlana Rumi
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list