[extropy-chat] Rapid prototyping makes police state more likely
John
john.heritage at v21.me.uk
Mon Sep 25 13:46:25 UTC 2006
I too have an major interest in machining and prototyping.
The sten gun is a good example, you can even download the files with the
instructions for building your own from mainly stamped metal parts (just
like the original).
http://www.btmon.com/Other/Unsorted/Weapons_Pistols_SMG_Rifle_blueprints_and_construction_manuals.torrent.html
Might be worth noting that stamping foil for christmas cards at home and
stamping sheet / plate aerospace materials for 4t robot drones are two
considerably different tasks. The latter is not something that's cheap and
easy to tool up for at home.
I believe the US (and probably Europe) already has a policy setup on
exporting machine tools due precisely to the concern that they could be used
for weapons manufacture, in the same way they have export policies on toxic
chemical precursors.
I must say here that I suspect a great deal of this is at best scare tactic
weapon lab talk to justify their tax expense.
Out of all of the sites I've ever visited on the net about machining, the
only ones that seem particularly interested in the idea of making guns are
those in the US. In fact, there's a guy in the US who was in the process of
building his own cruise missle from off-the-shelf parts to demonstrate that
a terrorist "could do it" - before he was stopped by the government I
believe. A lot of these sites are doing it under the excuse of
"demonstrating that a terrorist also could".
The problem is, a terrorist "doesn't need to do it". Nore do they need to
make automated drones or hand build their own guns when they have guys
willing to strap bombs to themselves (eager to do so and who'll be admired
by their friends) and can buy AK-47's for a minute fraction of the cost it
would take to setup the machines to make their own - I think an AK47 costs
about $40 in Africa, or less.
In the US, you can legally pick up a guns in a matter of weeks as I'm aware
of things. My brother was explaining how he'd been watching a TV show about
US guys who'd formed their own armed group and where patrolling the Mexican
boarder and inspecting people's Visas.
Perhaps in the future some terrorist group might want to have a go at
building a cruise missle just for the fear factor. But in terms of realism,
it's no where near a big enough threat to suggest banning the sale of
machine tools to the public domain in my opinion. I also suspect that
they'll probably just try buying a prebuilt missile of some form - maybe
from a Lockheed stock clearance sale.
There are newer and more advanced kinds of rapid desktop prototyping being
released now, like stereolithography. That's presently limited to resins and
plastics mainly. Combining it with some form of sintering process would
allow for people to print metallic and ceramic items. Again, are terrorists
going to bother when the machine costs $30k and the weapon $30? I doubt it.
A terrorists version of a high tech bomb is one with a 555 timer and LEDs -
beginner electronics stuff.
Personally, I was amazed at how much complaining people did about not being
able to take things into the cabin with the aeroplane problems. You're going
to be sitting there for a few hours. Are you planning on doing a touch of
water colouring painting along the way?
Whilst on the topic of weapons, the US is currently looking at redesigning
it's nuclear warheads with some form of more reliable version featuring
environmentally friendly material subsitutions (no, I'm not joking). Only
problem is, Bush Senior signed up for an end to nuclear weapons testing.
Lets see how that stands in five years - it doesn't take a whole lot of
imagination to work out how the Middle East might react to such a change of
heart.
John
BullGuard Anti-virus has scanned this e-mail and found it clean.
Try BullGuard for free: www.bullguard.com
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list