[extropy-chat] Nanoengineered terrestrial solar vs.nanoengineered space solar power
eugen at leitl.org
Sat Apr 7 17:20:22 UTC 2007
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 07:52:03AM -0700, spike wrote:
> Yes, but the old fashioned gallium arsenide cells are remarkably durable.
At current launch costs, the cells can be unobtainium. Very different
from terrestrial applications.
> Yes. Over time the output gradually decreases from impacts from high energy
> particles. Occasionally you get a cell shorted out from an extremely high
> energy cosmic ray that causes an SEGR or single event gate rupture. A
> particle whacks a cell hard enough to cause an ionized path across the NP
You also get micrometeorite surface abrasion, and in lower orbit plasma
glow in ram direction.
> Not exactly corrosion as we think of it down here, oxidation. Metals can
In lower orbit, it can be oxidation. But there you'd get a lot of drag from
a large array, so one would have to use electric or plasma thruster propulsion
to counteract that. Slightly higher orbits are probably the way to go.
> migrate but I wouldn't call that corrosion.
> > Impact?
> If you meant micrometeoroid, there are so sparse they aren't a major factor.
Really? They're a considerable factor on Moon surface, I thought.
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the extropy-chat