[extropy-chat] Wikipedia page and cryonics

[Robert Bradbury]

On 4/11/07, pjmanney <pj at pj-manney.com> wrote:
>
> Keith wrote:
> >*IF* people think cryonics status on the transhumanist list is a good
> idea,
> >reverting only requires going to the last version with the changes under
> >history, bringing up the editor and saving.  If you consider yourself a
> >transhumanist, you might so remark in the comments on the reversion.  I
> >really wonder how many are signed up?
>
> While I understand your historical argument, transhumanism isn't just
> about cryonics.  I agree with both Justice DeThezier's argument on WTA-talk
> (since I also said 'no') and Loremaster's rationale for
> discretion.  Cryonics status -- or any other personal status -- should not
> be a matter of public record, unless the individual requests it.
>
> Otherwise, it smacks of marketing or other hidden agendas.
>
> PJ
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20070411/dd4f7a7b/attachment.html>