[extropy-chat] Wikipedia page and cryonics
robert.bradbury at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 18:07:44 UTC 2007
On 4/11/07, pjmanney <pj at pj-manney.com> wrote:
> Keith wrote:
> >*IF* people think cryonics status on the transhumanist list is a good
> >reverting only requires going to the last version with the changes under
> >history, bringing up the editor and saving. If you consider yourself a
> >transhumanist, you might so remark in the comments on the reversion. I
> >really wonder how many are signed up?
> While I understand your historical argument, transhumanism isn't just
> about cryonics. I agree with both Justice DeThezier's argument on WTA-talk
> (since I also said 'no') and Loremaster's rationale for
> discretion. Cryonics status -- or any other personal status -- should not
> be a matter of public record, unless the individual requests it.
> Otherwise, it smacks of marketing or other hidden agendas.
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat