[extropy-chat] Wikipedia page and cryonics

Heartland velvethum at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 12 05:41:53 UTC 2007

> At 01:53 PM 4/11/2007 -0400, PJ wrote:
>>While I understand your historical argument, transhumanism isn't just 
>>about cryonics.  I agree with both Justice DeThezier's argument on 
>>WTA-talk (since I also said 'no') and Loremaster's rationale for 
>>discretion.  Cryonics status -- or any other personal status -- should not 
>>be a matter of public record, unless the individual requests it.
>>Otherwise, it smacks of marketing or other hidden agendas.
> There is an agenda, but it is hardly hidden.  If it isn't obvious, ask and 
> I will state it.
> Keith

Okay, let's hear it.


More information about the extropy-chat mailing list