[extropy-chat] Wikipedia page and cryonics
velvethum at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 12 05:41:53 UTC 2007
> At 01:53 PM 4/11/2007 -0400, PJ wrote:
>>While I understand your historical argument, transhumanism isn't just
>>about cryonics. I agree with both Justice DeThezier's argument on
>>WTA-talk (since I also said 'no') and Loremaster's rationale for
>>discretion. Cryonics status -- or any other personal status -- should not
>>be a matter of public record, unless the individual requests it.
>>Otherwise, it smacks of marketing or other hidden agendas.
> There is an agenda, but it is hardly hidden. If it isn't obvious, ask and
> I will state it.
Okay, let's hear it.
More information about the extropy-chat