[extropy-chat] Wikipedia page and cryonics
hkhenson at rogers.com
Wed Apr 11 21:21:30 UTC 2007
At 01:53 PM 4/11/2007 -0400, PJ wrote:
>While I understand your historical argument, transhumanism isn't just
>about cryonics. I agree with both Justice DeThezier's argument on
>WTA-talk (since I also said 'no') and Loremaster's rationale for
>discretion. Cryonics status -- or any other personal status -- should not
>be a matter of public record, unless the individual requests it.
I agree. Eric Drexler kept his status (signed up) out of the public eye
for a number of years. He made it public at an Extropian Conference in San
Jose at the same time Marvin Minsky did.
>Otherwise, it smacks of marketing or other hidden agendas.
There is an agenda, but it is hardly hidden. If it isn't obvious, ask and
I will state it.
More information about the extropy-chat