[extropy-chat] extropy-chat Digest, Vol 43, Issue 24
Eugen Leitl
eugen at leitl.org
Thu Apr 19 09:32:29 UTC 2007
Killthread.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:36:05AM +1000, Brett Paatsch wrote:
> Max wrote:
>
>
> >>PS. I respect that in the past you have not taken positions in
> >> favour of democracy. I hope you would not take a position in
> >> favour of fascism and promise breaking.
> >
> > I can barely believe that you asked me that
> > question. However, my eyes insist that these
> > incoming photons accurately represent the words
> > you wrote, so I suppose I must. I'm not deeply
> > enthusiastic about democracy because I see it as
> > restricting the liberty (and responsibility) of
> > the individual. That's as far as I will go in
> > dignifying an answer to this particular question.
>
> They aren't questions Max they are statements. I do respect
> that in the past you have had the courage and integrity to be
> open about your reservations about democracy. I too have
> reservations about democracy. If no one did then nothing
> better could arise.
>
> I am a libertarian. Being a libertarian in my book carries
> duties to defend freedom when freedom is threatened.
>
> George W Bush's "war on terror" is the stupidist most
> absurb proposition turned into policy that a country full
> of appeasers has sat and nodded at since Caligula married
> his horse.
>
> When the nazis came to power in Germany they were able
> to do so because men and women that could have together
> done something about it did not act early enough.
>
> I have issues with American libertarians because they are
> not, in sufficient numbers or more importantly in significant
> effective efforts, defending the most fundamental freedoms
> of all.
>
> Your extropian principles were an excellent effort by the
> younger man that was yourself to articulate a vision for a
> way forward. But fine words uttered in ones youth are not
> enough.
>
> If one will not stand up and fight for a principle and struggle and
> even die for a principle, ones most cherished principle, then one
> is not really alive.
>
> Why haven't I see you lobbying or writing for the impeachment
> of President Bush Max? There are people in your country that
> are - the case for it, the need for it could hardly be clearer. Why
> aren't you defending the constitution that is the bedrock of your
> real freedom?
>
> Your extropian principles, as has been discussed before, by folk
> like Hal come into tension with each other.
>
> We all have to make our living in this less than ideal world. But
> if we don't take a stand on anything because the highest goal
> we have is always to keep ourselves alive then we never really
> live.
>
> Bush has attacked science and reason and technology and
> people. He has said you are with us (meaning him) or against
> us. When Presidents or Feuhrers say those things and act
> above the law we cannot not take them seriously.
>
> The rule of law could use your support at this point in history
> Max. Humanity could. I could.
>
> Regards,
> Brett
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> extropy-chat mailing list
> extropy-chat at lists.extropy.org
> http://lists.extropy.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/extropy-chat
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the extropy-chat
mailing list