[extropy-chat] How to be copied into the future?

[Robert Bradbury]

On 4/22/07, Lee Corbin <lcorbin at rawbw.com> wrote:

> Since I can't complain about you, then, maybe I can go after Robert,
> who just wrote
>
> > Future "salvation vectors" are much more likely to be based upon
> > "wisdom vectors" rather than "mercy vectors".  Wise actions will
> > save many more people than merciful behaviors, particularly those
> > directed towards an improbable and unprovable direction.).


Oh  yea, pick on the minority will ya....  You, I hope, will note that I am
not
specifying directions, I am simply laying out possible paths.

By "salvation vector" are you trying to describe a merit list of those
> who *deserve* to be saved?   If so, then this still smacks of a rather
> vengeful God who punishes people in the next life for what they've
> done in the first one.


God, can we scrap this vector?  There is no "god" and there is no
"salvation" vector".  Can we put it to rest in this forum, as a thread,
forever?

Now completely separate from that one has a discussion of "who deserves to
be saved".
I would argue that the "saving" paradigm is a brief intersection in the
MBrain paradigm.
There may be a few moments during which the saving of static paradigms is a
default.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.extropy.org/pipermail/extropy-chat/attachments/20070422/3dd4e6dc/attachment.html>