[ExI] Computer Backups
ka.aly at luxsci.net
Sun Dec 2 22:52:34 UTC 2007
Your point is absolutely right. I didn't read this comment precisely at
first while. I don't use gmail services and haven't read the terms of
use. But I could almost definitely assume this would violate. I didn't
mean to sound suggestive, although my text would read so, but meant it
is an existing practical option to the masses for a limited sub-gb
storage. Be it porn or junk or real legitimate private/personal data,
then illegitimately stored by unidentified parties.
I do prefer client-based email, and I keep wondering why http mail has
not yet made it over the basic proprietary html limitation to become
optionally downloadable and locally manageable by a standard client.
Do you think the internet may merit just a little more attention to
regulatory issues at this time?
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On another list this caused a (temporary?) account suspension due
> POP3 and IMAP I suggest y'all use it, if you use for more than
> a sacrificial porn stash.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the extropy-chat