[ExI] simulation

Damien Broderick thespike at satx.rr.com
Mon Dec 17 17:08:58 UTC 2007

At 09:43 AM 12/17/2007 +0100, my brilliant e-pal Eugen Leitl wrote:

>We'll think of interpretations when we have observations violating
>Einstein's dictum (no superluminal information transfer). So far, there are
>none, zilch, zero.

This is simply not true, but since apparently nobody trotting out 
this mantra will read (for example) OUTSIDE THE GATES OF SCIENCE, 
there's no point in my saying so in this forum.

Damien Broderick

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list