[ExI] But speaking of psi...

Stathis Papaioannou stathisp at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 23:32:10 UTC 2007

On 18/12/2007, Damien Broderick <thespike at satx.rr.com> wrote:

> "Using Neuroimaging to Resolve the Psi Debate"
> Samuel T. Moulton and Stephen M. Kosslyn

> In the present study,
> functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used in an
> effort to document the existence of psi. If psi exists, it occurs in
> the brain, and hence, assessing the brain directly should be
> more sensitive than using indirect behavioral methods (as have
> been used previously).

That's a strange claim. It's like saying that assessing the brain
directly is a more sensitive way of determining what someone is saying
than listening to him.

Stathis Papaioannou

More information about the extropy-chat mailing list